Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40333802›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A contemporary tool for assessing instrumental activities of daily living: Validation of a caregiver-reported scale for non-institutionalized older adults.

Zainab Barakat, Hala Sacre, Sarah Khatib, Aline Hajj, Carmela BouMalham, Chadia Haddad, Rony M Zeenny, Marwan Akel, Linda Abou Abbas, Marc Barakat and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zainab BarakatFaculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadat, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6562-2914
Hala SacreInstitut National de Santé Publique d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban (INSPECT-LB), Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6547-6251
Sarah KhatibInstitut National de Santé Publique d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban (INSPECT-LB), Beirut, Lebanon.
Aline HajjInstitut National de Santé Publique d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban (INSPECT-LB), Beirut, Lebanon.
Carmela BouMalhamInstitut National de Santé Publique d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban (INSPECT-LB), Beirut, Lebanon.
Chadia HaddadInstitut National de Santé Publique d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban (INSPECT-LB), Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2413-2684
Rony M ZeennyInstitut National de Santé Publique d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban (INSPECT-LB), Beirut, Lebanon.
Marwan AkelInstitut National de Santé Publique d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban (INSPECT-LB), Beirut, Lebanon.
Linda Abou AbbasFaculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadat, Lebanon.
Marc BarakatDepartment of Psychiatry, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Samar RachidiClinical and Epidemiological Research Laboratory, Doctoral School of Science and Technology, Lebanese University, Hadat, Lebanon.
Pascale SalamehInstitut National de Santé Publique d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban (INSPECT-LB), Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4780-0772

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInstrumental activities of daily living (IADL) refer to activities necessary for independent living, emphasizing community-related tasks. The literature has limited measurement tools that address autonomous living in contemporary communities. Consequently, our study aimed to develop, cross-culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of a recently updated IADL scale called the Autonomy in Daily Functioning-Contemporary Scale (ADF-CS). Additionally, it sought to examine the level of agreement between informant reports and self-reports on the ADF-CS.

methodFollowing translation and cross-cultural adaptation, a first cross-sectional study was carried out among 544 family caregivers of community-dwelling older adults to assess the psychometric properties of the ADF-CS. The internal consistency of the scale was evaluated via Cronbach's alpha. Content and convergent validity, factorial analysis-including confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA)-and known group validity were also assessed. A second cross-sectional study involving 44 paired caregivers and care recipients was conducted to examine the level of agreement in responses to the ADF-CS scale between caregivers and older adults. Response agreement was evaluated through intraclass and Cohen's kappa correlation coefficients.

resultsThe internal consistency of the ADF-CS and its factors was high (Cronbach's alpha between 0.83 and 0.90). The robust positive correlation between the total ADF-CS score and the ADL score supported the convergent validity of the ADF-CS Arabic version. Moreover, the statistically significant variations in ADF-CS mean scores among various age groups and some chronic disease groups supported the scale's known group validity. The EFA of the ADF-CS yielded a two-factor solution with an eigenvalue exceeding 1, explaining 63.13% of the variance. The CFA demonstrated that all the items in each component fit well with their intended constructs. Additionally, the intraclass and kappa correlation coefficient results were excellent, indicating robust agreement in the responses of caregivers and their respective older adults.

conclusionThe Arabic version of the ADF-CS is a reliable and valid informant-reported measure for assessing IADL in older adults living in a contemporary community.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCaregiversAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40333802
PMCPMC12057986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.