Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40333751›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Effects of underground coal mining disturbance on bacterial community diversity and its assembly processes.

Fei Wang, Zehao Zhang, Zhaohua Lu, Junting Guo, Zhanyong Fu, Jingkuan Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fei WangSchool of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing, China.
Zehao ZhangSchool of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4442-3462
Zhaohua LuSchool of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing, China.
Junting GuoState Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining, Beijing, China.
Zhanyong FuShandong Key Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Science for the Yellow River Delta, Shandong University of Aeronautics, Binzhou, China.
Jingkuan SunShandong Key Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Science for the Yellow River Delta, Shandong University of Aeronautics, Binzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vegetation restoration is an important indicator for evaluating the health of mining ecosystems. Soil microorganisms influence soil material cycling and play an important role in vegetation restoration. Clarifying the effects of mining on soil microbial communities has spleen benefits for vegetation restoration. In this study, we analyzed the effects of mine disturbance on soil bacterial communities by high-throughput sequencing and setting up sampling sites at different distances from the mine site. The results showed that the α-diversity of the bacterial community gradually increased and the β-diversity changed with increasing distance from the mine site. The changes in β-diversity were mainly from rare taxa. Distance increased the relative abundance of Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Chloroflexi, but significantly decreased the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. Bacterial networks within the mine had higher robustness and edge counts, and the robustness of molecular ecological networks decreased with increasing distance. To adapt to the nutrient-poor nature of mine soils, microbial populations preferred to cooperate with each other. The bacterial community assembly processes in all sample sites were dominated by random dispersal and heterogeneous selection, contributing 49.24% and 43.87%, respectively. The bacterial community assembly processes in the mining area were dominated by deterministic processes (heterogeneous selection, 69.4%). Salt, SUE and SOM had the greatest impact on total, rich and rare bacterial community α-diversity, which were significantly negatively, positively and positively correlated, respectively. TK, SOM, SUE and SALP had significant effects on the bacterial community structure of all three taxa. βNTI increased significantly with increasing differences in TN and ALSP and decreased with increasing differences in salt. The above results suggest that mining affects the diversity, composition, and assembling processes of bacterial communities, and that the effect on abundant and rare taxa are different.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiodiversityCoal MiningMicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyEcosystemHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSoilSoil

Identifiers

PMID40333751
PMCPMC12057849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.