ArticlePloS one2025
Effects of underground coal mining disturbance on bacterial community diversity and its assembly processes.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vegetation restoration is an important indicator for evaluating the health of mining ecosystems. Soil microorganisms influence soil material cycling and play an important role in vegetation restoration. Clarifying the effects of mining on soil microbial communities has spleen benefits for vegetation restoration. In this study, we analyzed the effects of mine disturbance on soil bacterial communities by high-throughput sequencing and setting up sampling sites at different distances from the mine site. The results showed that the α-diversity of the bacterial community gradually increased and the β-diversity changed with increasing distance from the mine site. The changes in β-diversity were mainly from rare taxa. Distance increased the relative abundance of Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Chloroflexi, but significantly decreased the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. Bacterial networks within the mine had higher robustness and edge counts, and the robustness of molecular ecological networks decreased with increasing distance. To adapt to the nutrient-poor nature of mine soils, microbial populations preferred to cooperate with each other. The bacterial community assembly processes in all sample sites were dominated by random dispersal and heterogeneous selection, contributing 49.24% and 43.87%, respectively. The bacterial community assembly processes in the mining area were dominated by deterministic processes (heterogeneous selection, 69.4%). Salt, SUE and SOM had the greatest impact on total, rich and rare bacterial community α-diversity, which were significantly negatively, positively and positively correlated, respectively. TK, SOM, SUE and SALP had significant effects on the bacterial community structure of all three taxa. βNTI increased significantly with increasing differences in TN and ALSP and decreased with increasing differences in salt. The above results suggest that mining affects the diversity, composition, and assembling processes of bacterial communities, and that the effect on abundant and rare taxa are different.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.