ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Ensemble Machine Learning for the Prediction and Understanding of the Refractive Index in Chalcogenide Glasses.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chalcogenide glasses (ChGs) are a class of amorphous materials presenting remarkable mechanical, optical, and electrical properties, making them promising candidates for advanced photonic and optoelectronic applications. With the increasing integration of artificial intelligence in modern materials design, we are able to systematically select, prepare, and optimize appropriate compositions for desired applications in a manner that was unachievable before. This study employs various machine learning models to reliably predict the refractive index at 20 °C using a small dataset of 541 samples extracted from the SciGlass database. The input for the algorithms consists of a selected set of physico-chemical features computed for the chemical composition of each entry. Additionally, these algorithms served as inner models for an ensemble logistic regression estimator that achieved a superior R2 value of 0.8985. SHAP feature analysis of the second-best model, CatBoostRegressor (R2 = 0.8920), revealed the importance of elemental density, atomic weight, ground state atomic gap, and fraction of p valence electrons in tuning the value of the refractive index of a chalcogenide compound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.