Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40333686›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Comprehensive assessment of snow leopard distribution and population in the Indian Trans-Himalaya, Ladakh: Standardizing methods for evidence-based conservation.

Pankaj Raina, Ninad Avinash Mungi, Ujjwal Kumar, Aman Deep Rathi, Niazul H Khan, Dimpi A Patel, Anchal Bhasin, Shikha Bisht, Lex Hiby, Bivash Pandav and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pankaj RainaDepartment of Wildlife Protection, Leh, Union Territory of Ladakh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0780-4883
Ninad Avinash MungiWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India.
Ujjwal KumarWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4215-8781
Aman Deep RathiDepartment of Wildlife Protection, Leh, Union Territory of Ladakh, India.
Niazul H KhanDepartment of Wildlife Protection, Leh, Union Territory of Ladakh, India.
Dimpi A PatelDepartment of Wildlife Protection, Leh, Union Territory of Ladakh, India.
Anchal BhasinDepartment of Wildlife Protection, Leh, Union Territory of Ladakh, India.
Shikha BishtWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India.
Lex HibyConservation Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Bivash PandavWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India.
Mohd Sajid SultanDepartment of Wildlife Protection, Leh, Union Territory of Ladakh, India.
Jigmet Jigmet TakpaDepartment of Wildlife Protection, Leh, Union Territory of Ladakh, India.
Yadvendradev V JhalaWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective conservation of threatened species depends on accurate scientific assessment of their occurrence and population status. This information is often lacking or has poor scientific reliability for low-density carnivores, such as snow leopards (Panthera uncia) that inhabit remote and challenging habitats. We address prevalent sampling and study design limitations and evaluate the population and distribution of snow leopards and their prey using a double sampling approach across the Trans-Himalayan Ladakh (~59,000 km2), India. We used spatial data on the sign occurrence of snow leopards, collected by replicate sign surveys of 6,149 km to model occupancy and potential distribution. Regions representing varying occupancy were used to stratify density-estimation using spatially explicit capture-recapture by sampling 956 camera trap locations with an effort of 97,313 trap nights. Camera traps captured 26,130 images of 126 unique snow leopards identified by a pattern recognition program using their distinctive forehead pelage patterns. Low-elevation grassy and resource-rich regions, with moderate climatic conditions and complex terrain had higher presence of herbivores and consequently higher occupancy of snow leopards. Density of snow leopards was estimated at ~ 1 per 100 km2 with a large movement parameter (σ) of 4.09 (SE 0.15) km and detection at home-range centre (g0) of 0.003 (SE 0.0003). Snow leopard density reached up to 3.18 per 100 km2 and was driven by the distribution of their wild and domestic prey in suitable habitats. The snow leopards in Ladakh occupied 47,572 km2, holding globally highest extensive densities of snow leopards in Hemis National Park (2.073 ± 0.278 per 100 km²), Kargil (1.257 ± 0.480 per 100 km²), and Leh (1.029 ± 0.434 per 100 km²), and making one of the world's largest contiguous populations of 477 (CI 380-598) snow leopards. This population holds global significance as an important source of snow leopards, predominantly (61%) occurring in multi-use areas and closely linked with wild and domestic herbivores. We offer a robust and comprehensive method for large-scale population estimation of snow leopards, applicable globally. The co-occurrence of humans and wildlife across the landscape underscores the need for inclusive and evidence-based conservation planning, especially considering the impending large-scale infrastructural development and escalating global climatic changes.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesPantheraAnimalsEcosystemEndangered SpeciesIndiaPopulation DensityPopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID40333686
PMCPMC12057866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.