ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Long-term outcomes of antenatal corticosteroids for preterm birth: An overview of systematic reviews.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Erdosteine modulates surfactant-associated markers and preserves lung architecture in a preterm rat model compared with dexamethasone and betamethasone.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of Antenatal Corticosteroids on Brain Function and Underlying Mechanisms in Preclinical Studies: Protocol for a Systematic Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Retinopathy of prematurity: Clinical profiles and risk factors.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Timing of dexamethasone initiation during controlled ovarian stimulation and live birth after IVF/ICSI: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) is a critical preterm birth intervention that reduces neonatal mortality and short-term morbidities when administered to women at risk of preterm birth <34 weeks' gestation. While numerous systematic reviews have evaluated the effects of ACS on child health outcomes, this body of evidence has not been comprehensively assessed. This overview of systematic reviews thus aimed to comprehensively summarize the findings on the effects of ACS for preterm birth on long-term outcomes in children. We searched six electronic databases, with no date and language restrictions. Systematic reviews of randomized, non-randomized trials or observational studies that evaluated childhood health outcomes (assessed at age 12 months or older) for any ACS exposure compared to no ACS exposure, including comparisons between different types and regimens of ACS were eligible. We used the AMSTAR-2 tool to assess the quality of the included reviews. We included 19 systematic reviews. We identified a wide range of outcomes across the included reviews and categorized them as neurodevelopmental, psychological, physical growth, respiratory, cardiovascular, and survival/mortality outcomes. The reported outcomes were substantially varied in terms of operational definitions, terminology, timing of assessment, and measurement. No benefits or harms were observed for most of the reported outcomes following ACS exposure, though many outcomes had few participants. Available evidence suggested that a single course of ACS possibly has positive effects on selected neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, ACS exposure might also have adverse effects on psychological and some neurodevelopmental outcome in children born at late preterm or at term. Heterogeneity in outcome measurements and reporting, including overall confidence in results, contributes to uncertainties about long-term effect of ACS and warrants caution while interpreting the findings. Further high-quality research is required to generate robust evidence base on the effects of ACS on long-term child health outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.