ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Dynamics of care and sector use between birth, contraception and sick child services.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Governments in low- and middle-income countries increasingly recognize their role as stewards of mixed health systems comprising both public and private actors, but policy often lacks a nuanced understanding of how individuals switch between these two sectors for their healthcare needs, especially for family planning (FP) and maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH). In this cross-sectional study, we used data collected by The Demographic and Health Surveys Program between 2014-2021 from eight countries (Afghanistan, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Uganda) to describe service and sector use among women with a recent birth, a need for FP, and a child under five years old experiencing an illness (N = 53,014). We applied multivariable logistic regressions in each country to test the associations first between sector for birth and missed opportunities for contraceptives or sick child care, and next, between sector use dynamics between birth and contraceptive use (sector fidelity, sector switching, or nonuse of services) and nonuse of sick child care. Sector at facility for birth and sector switching between services was common, but neither were generally associated with missed opportunities for care for sick children. However, private sector use at birth predicted nonuse of contraceptives in four countries, though the directionality varied. Consistently, women who did not access care at birth and contraception had significantly greater odds of missing care for sick children. Notably, in Malawi, the adjusted odds ratio of missed sick child care among those with nonuse of care for birth or contraceptives was 2.5 times that of those with sector fidelity (95% Confidence Interval: 1.43-4.22). These findings underscore the need for health system stewards to closely consider both the public and private sectors in health governance. Greater cross-sectoral cooperation and continuity of care is paramount to improving health outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.