ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Comparative Study on the Finite Element Analysis of Multilayered Honeycomb Composite Materials for Aerospace Structures.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Honeycomb composite materials are widely used in many areas of mechanical engineering where weight saving is a crucial factor. One of the main loads that such material configurations are designed to withstand is compressive load. The most important industrial sector where honeycomb composite materials have found their application is in the aerospace industry, due to their advantages of high strength and lightness. In this article, two forms of finite element model analyses are presented for a novel multilayered honeycomb composite material with impregnated paper cores. The first represents a detailed approach tailored for local analysis, while the second is useful for a global analysis of the honeycomb composite material. Both types of modeling techniques are presented with a description of their advantages and drawbacks, highlighting the increased precision of the complex model-closest deformation estimations-and the agility of the equivalent one-an 80% reduction in complexity, providing acceptable results. An initial comparative analysis is performed, and the obtained results are discussed. An experimental validation is also carried out, followed by the presentation of a suggested practical application, displaying good accordance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.