Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40333357›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2025

Modeling Brownian Motion as a Timelapse of the Physical, Persistent Trajectory.

Ludovico Cademartiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ludovico CademartiriDepartment of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 17 A, Parma 43121, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8805-9434

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While it is very common to model diffusion as a random walk by assuming memorylessness of the trajectory and diffusive step lengths, these assumptions can lead to significant errors. This paper describes the extent to which the physical trajectory of a Brownian particle can be described by a random walk. Analysis of "timelapses" of physical trajectories (calculated over collisional time scales using a velocity autocorrelation function that captures the hydrodynamic and acoustic effects induced by the solvent) yielded two observations: (i) these subsampled trajectories become genuinely memoryless only when their time step is ∼200 times larger than the relaxation time, and (ii) the distributions of the subsampled step lengths have variances that are significantly smaller than the diffusional ones (usually by a factor of ∼2). This last observation is due to two facts: diffusional displacements are mathematically "superballistic" at short time scales, and subsampled trajectories are "moving averages" of the underlying physical trajectory. The counterintuitive result is that the mean squared displacement (MSD) of the physical trajectory asymptotically approaches 2Dt (where D is diffusivity) at long time intervals

Identifiers

PMID40333357
PMCPMC12147200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.