Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40333354›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Evaluation of the Porosity and Morphology of Microstructured Charcoal.

Andrzej Biessikirski, Michał Dworzak, Grzegorz Piotr Kaczmarczyk, Grzegorz Machowski, Magdalena Ziąbka, Agata Kaczmarczyk, Joanna Jakóbczyk, Suzana Gotovac-Atlagić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrzej BiessikirskiFaculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2023-6454
Michał DworzakFaculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.
Grzegorz Piotr KaczmarczykFaculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7766-8493
Grzegorz MachowskiFaculty of Geology, Geophysics, and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4589-0433
Magdalena ZiąbkaFaculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, Department of Ceramics and Refractories, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0702-7137
Agata KaczmarczykIndependent Researcher, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.
Joanna JakóbczykFaculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5030-9637
Suzana Gotovac-AtlagićFaculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Banja Luka, Mladena Stojanovića 2, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.ORCID 0000-0002-9667-9884

Funding

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Krakow 16.16.100.215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive assessment of the morphology and porosity of microstructured charcoal using a combination of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), computed tomography (CT), and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) methods. SEM analysis revealed a parallel arrangement of tube-like structures interspersed with smaller pores, confirming the presence of fibrous formations. MIP evaluation was conducted in two research series. MIP results identified macropores as the primary contributors to mercury intrusion; however, a minor volume of mercury also intrudes to the mesopores. The total pore area was determined to range between 70.7 and 88.5 m

Indexed as

charcoalfibrous structuresmercury intrusion porositySEMtomographywall thickness

Identifiers

PMID40333354
PMCPMC12028932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.