Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40333304›Full record

ReviewVaccines2025

Monitoring Immune Responses to Vaccination: A Focus on Single-Cell Analysis and Associated Challenges.

LaToya Montgomery, Anis Larbi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mucosal immunity and vaccine development.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

LaToya MontgomeryMedical and Scientific Affairs, Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, Brea, CA 92821, USA.
Anis LarbiMedical and Scientific Affairs, Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, Brea, CA 92821, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring the immune response to vaccination encompasses both significant challenges and promising opportunities for scientific advancement. The primary challenge lies in the inherent complexity and interindividual variability of immune responses, influenced by factors including age, genetic background, and prior immunological history. This variability necessitates the development of sophisticated, highly sensitive assays capable of accurately quantifying immune parameters such as antibody titers, T-cell responses, and cytokine profiles. Furthermore, the temporal dynamics of the immune response require comprehensive longitudinal studies to elucidate the durability and quality of vaccine-induced immunity. Challenges of this magnitude pave the way for immunological research advancements and diagnostic methodologies. Cutting-edge monitoring techniques, such as high-throughput sequencing and advanced flow cytometry, enable deeper insights into the mechanistic underpinnings of vaccine efficacy and contribute to the iterative design of more effective vaccines. Additionally, the integration of analytical tools holds the potential to predict immune responses and tailor personalized vaccination strategies. This will be addressed in this review to provide insight for enhancing public health outcomes and fortifying preparedness against future infectious disease threats.

Indexed as

flow cytometryimmune responsereproducibilityvaccination

Identifiers

PMID40333304
PMCPMC12030821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.