ArticleVaccines2025
Mind the Age Gap: Expanding the Age Window for mRNA Vaccine Testing in Mice.
Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing mouse models for mRNA vaccines: addressing dose translation challenges.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deciphering the biological fate of mRNA-LNP-based biologics: A perspective from tissue to intracellular distribution.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Correction: Hussain et al. Mind the Age Gap: Expanding the Age Window for mRNA Vaccine Testing in Mice.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesMurine models play a key role in guiding formulation and immunogenicity studies across various vaccine platforms, including mRNA-based vaccines. Typically, a narrow age range (6 to 8 weeks) is used in these studies. Here, we investigated whether widening this age range could provide greater flexibility in experimental design without impacting pre-clinical outcomes.
methodsTo achieve this, we evaluated two commonly used lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations (based on SM102 and ALC-0315 ionizable lipids) containing either firefly luciferase or ovalbumin mRNA in female BALB/c mice aged 4, 8, and 16 weeks. LNPs were prepared and purified via microfluidics, and their size, polydispersity, zeta potential, and encapsulation efficiency were measured. Mice were injected intramuscularly, and the in vivo bioluminescence and antibody titers were measured to evaluate mRNA expression profiles and immunogenicity across the three age groups.
resultsOur findings show that the 4-week-old mice exhibited higher protein expression following mRNA administration compared to the older groups; however, no significant differences were observed between the 8- and 16-week-old mice. Despite the initial higher protein expression, the antibody responses after the prime dose were lower in the 4-week-old mice compared to the other two groups. However, following the booster dose, antibody levels were comparable across all three age groups.
conclusionsBy identifying a broader age range window, we provide greater flexibility in study design, enhance data comparability across studies, and promote more efficient use of animal resources, all while maintaining reliable and representative results in these murine models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.