Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40333137›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Change of Heart: Can Artificial Intelligence Transform Infective Endocarditis Management?

Jack W McHugh, Douglas W Challener, Hussam Tabaja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jack W McHughDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7507-232X
Douglas W ChallenerDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6964-9639
Hussam TabajaDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising adjunct in the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis (IE), a disease characterized by diagnostic complexity and significant morbidity. Machine learning (ML) models such as SABIER and SYSUPMIE have demonstrated strong predictive accuracy for early IE diagnosis, embolic risk stratification, and postoperative mortality, surpassing traditional clinical scoring systems. In imaging, AI-enhanced echocardiography and advanced modalities like FDG-PET/CT offer improved sensitivity, specificity, and reduced inter-observer variability, potentially transforming clinical decision making. Additionally, AI-powered microbiological techniques, including MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry combined with ML and neural network-based metagenomic classifiers, show promise in rapidly identifying pathogens and predicting antimicrobial resistance. Despite encouraging early results, widespread adoption faces barriers, including data limitations, interpretability issues, ethical concerns, and the need for robust validation. Future directions include leveraging generative AI as clinical consultative tools, provided their capabilities and limitations are carefully managed. Ultimately, collaborative efforts addressing these challenges could transform IE care, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, clinical outcomes, and patient safety.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEndocarditisDisease ManagementEchocardiographyHumansMachine Learningartificial intelligenceclinical decision supportdeep learningdiagnostic imagingechocardiographyinfective endocarditismachine learningmachine visionrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID40333137
PMCPMC12030482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.