ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2025
Machine Learning Methods to Track Dynamic Facial Function in Facial Palsy.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Facial Palsy: A Narrative Review Across the Care Continuum.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2026Review
- A review of the application of intelligent sensing technology in the recognition and evaluation of facial paralysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveFor patients with facial palsy, the wait for return of facial function and resulting vision risk from poor eye closure, difficulty speaking and eating from flaccid oral sphincter muscles, and psychological morbidity from the inability to smile or express emotions can be devastating. There are limited methods to assess ongoing facial nerve regeneration: clinicians rely on subjective descriptions, imprecise scales, and static photographs to evaluate facial functional recovery. We propose a more precise evaluation of dynamic facial function through video-based machine learning analysis to facilitate a better understanding of the sometimes subtle onset of facial nerve recovery and improve guidance for facial reanimation surgery.
methodsWe present machine learning methods employing likelihood ratio tests, optimal transport theory, and Mahalanobis distances to: 1) assess the use of defined facial landmarks for binary classification of different facial palsy types; 2) identify regions of asymmetry and potential palsy during specific facial cues; and 3) quantify palsy severity and map it directly to widely used clinical scores, offering clinicians an objective way to assess facial nerve function.
resultsOur results demonstrate that video analysis provides a significantly more accurate and detailed assessment of facial movements than previously reported.
conclusionsOur work allows for precise classification of facial palsy types, identification of asymmetric regions, and assessment of palsy severity. SIGNIFICANCE: This project enables clinicians to have more accurate and timely information to make decisions for facial reanimation surgery, which will have drastic consequences on the quality of life for affected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.