ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2025
Asymptotic Enumeration of Normal and Hybridization Networks via Tree Decoration.
Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Counting Spinal Phylogenetic Networks.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Article
- Counting Rankings of Tree-Child Networks.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Article
- A Dichotomy Law for Certain Classes of Phylogenetic Networks.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phylogenetic networks provide a more general description of evolutionary relationships than rooted phylogenetic trees. One way to produce a phylogenetic network is to randomly place k arcs between the edges of a rooted binary phylogenetic tree with n leaves. The resulting directed graph may fail to be a phylogenetic network, and even when it is it may fail to be a tree-child or normal network. In this paper, we first show that if k is fixed, the proportion of arc placements that result in a normal network tends to 1 as n grows. From this result, the asymptotic enumeration of normal networks becomes straightforward and provides a transparent meaning to the combinatorial terms that arise. Moreover, the approach extends to allow k to grow with n (at the rate
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.