ArticleCommunity mental health journal2025
Predictors of Service Engagement and Disengagement in Community-Based Coordinated Specialty Care for Early Psychosis in Texas.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coordinated specialty care (CSC) is an evidence-based, early intervention approach for individuals with a recent onset of psychosis. This study identifies program and individual characteristics that predict (1) initial engagement in care; (2) the use of peer and family partner services; and (3) time to disengagement. Administrative data representing CSC encounters at 22 community mental health programs were analyzed. Logistic regressions were used to model initial CSC engagement, as well as the use of peer or family partner services, given initial engagement. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to quantify program disengagement, with possible time-varying effects of peer service use. Identified predictors of initial engagement included: race/ethnicity, age, diagnosis, program urbanicity, and program maturity. Identified predictors of disengagement in the first year included: diagnosis, program urbanicity, and program maturity. Peer and family partner services did not significantly predict disengagement. These results suggest equity issues for some individuals, while also highlighting the importance of program characteristics on pathways to care. Future research should include program factors as key predictors for engagement, explore both person-centered and program-centered strategies to maximize engagement, and optimize and examine the role of individual and family peer services in engagement. Such a shift would align with the call to understand pathways to care from a community-level rather than individual lens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.