ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Exploring the association between chemotherapy and prognosis among patients less than 50 years old with hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study based on the SEER database.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic Value of the SEA Score in Double-Negative DCP/AFP Unresectable HCC with Triple Therapy.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimHepatic carcinoma, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is one of the most common malignant tumors globally, with an increasing incidence among younger populations. While chemotherapy is effective for advanced HCC, its impact on the prognosis of younger patients, who typically have better physiological conditions, remains unclear. Younger patients may have different tumor biology and chemotherapy responses than older patients. This study aims to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy on the prognosis and survival rates of younger HCC patients.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database, which provides information on cancer statistics among the US population. We selected patients diagnosed with primary HCC between 2010 and 2015. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received chemotherapy or not. Kaplan-Meier analyses were utilised to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy on prognosis by comparing the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the two groups. After performing 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), the differences in OS and CSS were reassessed.
resultsBefore PSM, there were 1662 participants with primary HCC. After PSM, the sample was reduced to 1154 participants, with 577 individuals in each chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy group. Before PSM, there was no statistically significant difference in OS and CSS between the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy groups (P = 0.25 and P = 0.06). After PSM, although the survival time in the chemotherapy group was slightly extended, the difference remained statistically insignificant (P = 0.09 and P = 0.38). Kaplan-Meier curves indicated no significant difference between the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy groups, both before and after PSM, further supporting the conclusion that chemotherapy did not significantly improve survival in young patients with HCC.
conclusionChemotherapy did not significantly improve survival for young patients with HCC. Treatment decisions should be approached cautiously, especially in cases with complex tumor characteristics. Future studies should explore the mechanisms of chemotherapy in younger patients and develop personalized treatment strategies to improve long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.