ReviewPlanta2025
Application of proteomics in investigating the responses of plant to abiotic stresses.
Review in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of primary protectors of plant cells in salinity tolerance: molecular mechanisms and adaptive strategies.Plant signaling & behavior · 2026Review
- Article
- Untargeted Metabolomics Reveals Organ-Specific Metabolites Associated with Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities in Finger Citron (Metabolites · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics integration for plant enhancement: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Multi-Omics Dissection of Drought Stress Responses in Crops: From Molecular Regulatory Networks to Climate-Resilient Breeding Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Network-Driven Insights into Plant Immunity: Integrating Transcriptomic and Proteomic Approaches in Plant-Pathogen Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Involvement of Pathogenesis-Related Proteins and Their Roles in Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants.Biomolecules · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionThis review summarizes the application of proteomic techniques in investigating the responses of plant to abiotic stresses. In the natural environment, the plants are exposed to a diverse range of adverse abiotic factors that significantly impact their growth and development. The plants have evolved intricate stress response mechanisms at the genetic, protein, metabolic, and phenotypic levels to mitigate damage caused by unfavorable conditions. Proteomics serves as an effective tool for studying protein changes in plants and provides valuable insights into the physiological mechanisms underlying plant stress resistance. Several proteins involved in abiotic stress responses have been identified in plants, including transcription factors, protein kinases, ATP synthases, heat shock proteins, redox proteins, and enzymes in secondary metabolite pathways. Medicinal plants are a unique category of crops capable of synthesizing secondary metabolites, which play a crucial role in resisting abiotic stress and exhibit changes in content under stress conditions. In this review, we present an overview of proteomic tools employed for investigating the responses of plants to abiotic stresses and summarize alterations observed at the protein level under various abiotic stresses such as signal transduction, oxidative damage, carbohydrate and energy metabolism, protein and amino acid metabolism, cellular homeostasis, and enzyme involvement in secondary metabolism. This work aims to facilitate the application of proteomics techniques in plants research while enhancing our understanding of the response mechanisms exhibited by these plants towards abiotic stresses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40332605What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.