Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40332601›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2025

Angiographic results of aneurysms treated with Woven EndoBridge (WEB) devices or coils: an inter- and intra-observer reliability study.

Pierre-Olivier Comby, Tim E Darsaut, Anass Benomar, Nicolas Lecaros, Hanan Alhazmi, Alain Weill, Daniela Iancu, Roland Jabre, William Boisseau, Maier Benjamin and 23 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Pierre-Olivier CombyCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France. pierreolivier.comby@gmail.com.
Tim E DarsautUniversity of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Canada. tdarsaut@ualberta.ca.
Anass BenomarCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Nicolas LecarosCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Hanan AlhazmiCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Alain WeillCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Daniela IancuCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Roland JabreCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
William BoisseauFondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Maier BenjaminFondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Robert FahedOttawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
Mohamad AbdalkaderBoston Medical Center, Boston, USA.
Michael M C ChowUniversity of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Canada.
Owen StechishinUniversity of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Canada.
Thanh N NguyenBoston Medical Center, Boston, USA.
Pierre ThouantCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Brivael LemogneCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Angélique BernardCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Adrien ChaventCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Francois LebeaupinCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Laura BaptisteCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Marc LenfantCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Francois ZhuCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France.
Humain BaharvahdatFondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Andrea GambinoAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Jai J S ShankarUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Cian J O'KellyUniversity of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Canada.
Zul KaderaliUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Jean DarcourtCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Tristan Brunette-ClémentCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Leonardo OlijnikCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Daniel RoyCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Jean RaymondCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada. Jean.raymond@umontreal.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAngiographic results are commonly used to evaluate and compare the treatment of aneurysms. We sought to determine and compare the reliability and clinical implications of a commonly used 3-point angiographic outcome scale for aneurysms treated with WEB or endovascular coils.

methodsAn electronic portfolio of 60 aneurysms (30 treated with WEB devices and 30 with coils) was evaluated by 32 raters of various training backgrounds, who were asked to grade angiographic results and provide management recommendations (delayed follow-up, close follow-up, or re-treatment). Twenty-five raters performed a second evaluation of permuted cases at least a month later. Agreement was analyzed with Gwet's AC2 (κ

resultsInter-rater agreement was substantial for occlusion grade (κ

conclusionA commonly used 3-point scale was shown to be a reliable tool to compare the results of aneurysms treated with WEB devices or endovascular coils.

Indexed as

Cerebral AngiographyEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsTreatment OutcomeAneurysm treatmentAngiographic outcomesCoilingInter-rater reliabilityWEB device

Identifiers

PMID40332601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.