ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2025
Evaluating machine learning approaches to predict the energy expenditure of cross-national preschool children: a study of preprocessing and feature effects.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to examine the impact of preprocessing and inclusion of various features on predicting the energy expenditure (EE) of preschool children (3.0-6.99 years).
methodsThe internal Canadian sample consisted of 36 children, equipped with accelerometers on their wrists (OPAL) and right hip (ActiGraph GT9X). The external German sample consisted of 41 children, equipped with accelerometers on their wrists (GENEActiv) and right hip (GENEActiv; ActiGraph GT3X +). Both datasets used portable metabolic units to record EE. The effects of filtering, rectifying, adding a time delay, frequency domain (FD) features, and participant features on EE prediction across linear regression, random forest (RF), and fully connected neural network models. The Canadian sample was split into training (2/3) and validation (1/3) sets, and the German sample served as an external validation set.
resultsConsistently it was found that the RF with filtered, not rectified data with FD, participant features, and a time delay resulted in improved performance compared to approaches used previously. The models also performed similarly in the holdout sample but resulted in higher error when applied in the external validation dataset.
conclusionsResults attest that filtering, not rectifying, FD features and participant features result in improved model performance to predict the EE of preschool children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40332588What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.