ArticleDiabetologia2025
Time in tight range and time in range for predicting the achievement of typical glucose management indicator and HbA
Article in Diabetologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glycemic Variability Bridges Time in Range and Time in Tight Range: A Unified Equation for Both Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Based on Large-Scale Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Clinical and socioeconomic determinants of glycaemic control derived from continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aims/hypothesisThis study aimed to compare the ability of time in tight range (TITR) and time in range (TIR) to predict the achievement of typical glucose management indicator (GMI) and HbA
methodsThis cross-sectional analysis included 773 adults with diabetes receiving insulin therapy who visited Samsung Medical Center between June 2019 and December 2023 and wore a Dexcom G6 or FreeStyle Libre continuous glucose monitor for at least 90 days (sensor wear time, ≥70%). A receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare the ability of TITR and TIR to predict GMI and HbA
resultsTITR had significantly greater AUC values than TIR for predicting GMIs of <53 mmol/mol (7.0%) and <48 mmol/mol (6.5%) among participants using a Dexcom G6 or FreeStyle Libre continuous glucose monitor. TITR also had significantly greater AUC values than TIR for predicting HbA CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationTITR might be a more useful indicator than TIR of the achievement of typical GMI and HbA
Indexed as
Identifiers
40332559What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.