ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
An Optimized Editing Approach for Wheat Genes by Improving sgRNA Design and Transformation Strategies.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic engineering of cereal lipids: from omega-3 fatty acids to wax esters and pheromones.Advanced biotechnology · 2026Review
- Advancing Wheat Productivity Through Nutrient Interactions, Fertilizer Practices, and Genetic Improvement.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances in CRISPR/Cas systems for engineering abiotic stress tolerance in plants: mechanisms and future prospects.Planta · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hexaploid wheat has a large genome, making it difficult for transgenes to produce phenotypes due to gene redundancy and tight linkage among genes. Multiple gene copies typically necessitate multiple targeting events during gene editing, followed by several generations of self-crossing to achieve homozygous genotypes. The high cost of transgenesis in wheat is another issue, which hinders the easy availability of gene-edited materials in wheat. In this study, we developed a comprehensive approach to improve wheat gene editing efficiency. First, we established a protoplast-based system to evaluate the relative efficiency of gene editing targets, which enabled the rapid and effective selection of optimal sgRNAs. We then compared two transformation strategies: biolistic bombardment and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation for generating edited wheat lines. Although biolistic bombardment showed higher initial editing efficiency, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation proved more effective for obtaining homozygous mutants. Notably, we discovered that deploying the same sgRNA through different vectors enhanced editing efficiency, whereas overlapping but distinct sgRNAs exhibited interference effects. Finally, we optimized the VITF-edit (virus-induced transgene free editing) technique using BSMV delivery to establish a relatively simple and easily applied wheat gene editing method for general laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.