SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Tamoxifen and Fertility in Women with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review on Reproductive Outcomes and Oncological Safety of Treatment Interruption.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tamoxifen Therapy Is Associated With Altered Intestinal P-Glycoprotein Activity In Vivo.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- The role of patient age in fertility preservation among women with breast cancer: biological mechanisms and clinical implications.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- The mediating role of the intimate relationship between dyadic coping and reproductive concerns in breast cancer patients of childbearing age: a descriptive cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Metastatic Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma Involving Tamoxifen-related Endometrial Polyp in a Patient With Metachronous Bilateral Breast Carcinomas: A Case Report.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignancy among women worldwide, with a rising incidence in young, premenopausal patients. For those diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) BC, tamoxifen is a cornerstone of adjuvant endocrine therapy, significantly reducing recurrence risk and improving long-term survival. However, its prolonged use poses challenges for women desiring pregnancy, prompting interest in temporary treatment interruption as a strategy to achieve reproductive goals while maintaining oncological safety. This systematic review evaluates the impact of tamoxifen on fertility, the feasibility of treatment interruption, and associated reproductive and oncological outcomes. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search across major databases, identifying three relevant studies, including one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and two observational cohort studies. The findings suggest that temporary tamoxifen interruption allows for successful pregnancies without significantly increasing short-term recurrence rates. Notably, the POSITIVE trial demonstrated a pregnancy achievement rate of 74% and a live birth rate of 63.8%, with comparable three-year disease-free survival between patients who interrupted tamoxifen and those who continued therapy. However, concerns remain regarding tamoxifen's teratogenic risks, emphasizing the need for strict contraceptive measures and preconception counseling. Despite emerging evidence supporting this approach, long-term safety data are limited. Further research is warranted to refine clinical recommendations and optimize reproductive counseling for young BC survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.