Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40332377›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

How Cells Die in Psoriasis?

Chung-Han Chen, Nan-Lin Wu, Tsen-Fang Tsai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chung-Han ChenDepartment of Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City 100, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0003-8203-6882
Nan-Lin WuDepartment of Dermatology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei City 104, Taiwan.
Tsen-Fang TsaiDepartment of Dermatology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City 100, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1498-1474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psoriasis, a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disorder characterized by keratinocyte hyperproliferation and inflammatory cell infiltration, involves multiple distinct programmed cell death pathways in its pathogenesis. Following the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death recommendations, we analyzed the current literature examining diverse modes of cellular death in psoriatic lesions, with particular focus on keratinocyte cell death patterns and their molecular signatures. Analysis revealed several distinct cell death mechanisms: autophagy dysfunction through IL-17A pathways, decreased apoptotic activity in lesional skin, medication targeting anoikis in psoriasis, upregulated necroptosis mediated by RIPK1/MLKL signaling, gasdermin-mediated pyroptosis with enhanced IL-1β secretion, coordinated PANoptotic activation through specialized complexes, PARP1-mediated parthanatos promoting cutaneous inflammation, iron-dependent ferroptosis correlating with Th22/Th17 responses, copper-dependent cuproptosis with elevated MTF1/ATP7B/SLC31A1 expression, and NETosis amplifying immune responses through interaction with the Th17 axis. The intricate interplay between these cell death mechanisms has led to the development of targeted therapeutic strategies, including mTOR inhibitors for autophagy modulation, RIPK1 inhibitors for necroptosis, and various approaches targeting ferroptosis and NETosis, providing new directions for more effective psoriasis treatments.

Indexed as

Cell DeathPsoriasisAnimalsApoptosisAutophagyFerroptosisHumansKeratinocytesNecroptosisSignal Transductioncell deathprospective therapeutic approachespsoriasis

Identifiers

PMID40332377
PMCPMC12027842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.