ArticleEpidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil2025
Adaptation and validation of a tool for assessing food knowledge based on the Nova classification for the Brazilian context.
Article in Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo adapt and validate a tool to measure the level of food knowledge based on the Nova classification for the Brazilian context.
methodsA tool developed by Canadian researchers was adapted for Brazil. In this tool, respondents assign healthiness scores to 12 images of foods with different levels of industrial processing according to the Nova classification - unprocessed and minimally processed, processed and ultra-processed. Total score is computed by comparing scores assigned to foods from different groups, and range from 0 to 8. The Brazilian version, named Nova-Conhecimento, was evaluated by experts and submitted to pre-tests with potential users. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing scores of undergraduate students of nutrition and undergraduate students in education-related fields. Convergent validity was assessed by testing the association between the knowledge score and the consumption of ultra-processed foods in a subsample of the NutriNet Brazil cohort (n=1,245).
resultsNutrition students had higher scores than education students (6.7 vs. 5.3; p-value<0.001). Each point in the knowledge score was associated with a reduction of 1.03 percentage points in the contribution of ultra-processed foods to the diet (p-value<0.001).
conclusionThe Nova-Conhecimento tool demonstrated validity and can contribute to food and nutritional surveillance activities based on the the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.