Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40332277›Full record

Trial reportRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2025

Comparison of high- and low-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome.

İsmail Ceylan, Büşra Kürtüncüoğlu, Figen Tuncay, Mehmet Canli, Halil Alkan, Abdulhamit Tayfur

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05681663 (The Effectiveness of Different Pressure of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05681663 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Effectiveness of Different Pressure of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAhi Evran University Education and Research HospitalRan2023 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsCarpal Tunnel SyndromeArmsElectroshock Wave therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

İsmail CeylanKırşehir Ahi Evran University, School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation - Kırşehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6465-0243
Büşra KürtüncüoğluKırşehir Ahi Evran University, School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation - Kırşehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2842-946X
Figen TuncayKırşehir Ahi Evran University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation - Kırşehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0886-2006
Mehmet CanliKırşehir Ahi Evran University, School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation - Kırşehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8868-9599
Halil AlkanMuş Alparslan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation - Muş, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6895-2495
Abdulhamit TayfurKırşehir Ahi Evran University, School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation - Kırşehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7366-5212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy administered at low vs. high pressures in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

methodsPatients with carpal tunnel syndrome were randomized into two groups: low-dose group and high-dose group. Each patient underwent a total of four sessions of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, administered once a week. The radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy was delivered at 4.0 bars for the high-dose group and 1.5 bars for the low-dose group. Both groups received conventional physical therapy program consisting of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, paraffin wax, orthoses, and tendon gliding exercises, three times per week over a 4-week duration. Outcome measures included pain levels, hand grip strength, pinch strength, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, and nerve conduction studies.

resultsBoth groups exhibited improvements across all measures, except for the nerve conduction studies parameters. In the intragroup analysis, statistically significant differences were observed with small-to-moderate effect sizes for median motor distal latency, median sensory nerve conduction velocity, median sensory distal latency, and the Boston functional status subscale, all favoring the high-dose group (p<0.05). In the low-dose group, a statistically significant difference with a moderate effect size was noted solely for hand grip strength (p<0.05).

conclusionHigh-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy was significantly better than low-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy with small-to-moderate effect sizes in the recovery of the function and nerve conduction studies parameters of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: The study was registered on the Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: NCT05681663).

Indexed as

Carpal Tunnel SyndromeExtracorporeal Shockwave TherapyAdultAgedFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural ConductionPain MeasurementTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40332277
PMCPMC12051945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.