Trial reportRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2025
Is cesarean scar defect becoming history? The effect of uterotomy closure.
Trial report in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of uterine closure techniques following cesarean section on the development of cesarean scar defects: consigning cicatrix to history?Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Barbed Double-Needle Suture for Cesarean Section Uterine Incision Closure: Postoperative Pain and 12-Month Scar Outcomes.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- A retrospective analysis of the efficacy of baseball suture method in single-port laparoscopic myomectomy.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIsthmocele or cesarean scar defect is a pouch-like defect in the myometrium at the isthmic level that is thought that it might occur as a result of the insufficient healing process of the uterine incision after cesarean section. It is important not to underestimate isthmocele and its preventive measures since it might cause serious gynecologic and obstetric complications. However, the best suturing technique suitable for the prevention of isthmocele formation is yet to be identified. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three different uterine closure techniques applied during cesarean section on isthmocele formation.
methodsIn this prospective study, a total of 120 term (>37 weeks) pregnant women with no history of cesarean section and scheduled for primary cesarean section were randomized preoperatively to three different uterotomy closure techniques (baseball, single-locked, and single-unlocked groups).
resultsIn a total of 43 patients, postoperative third-month sonography revealed isthmocele as an anechoic triangular area with ≥1 mm depth at the scar site. Compared with the single-locked and single-unlocked groups, isthmocele development was significantly lower in the baseball-type closure group (47.5% in the single-locked, 46.2% in the single-unlocked, and 15.4% in the baseball-type closure group). The group with the highest residual myometrial thickness, that is, 5.7 mm, was again the patients who underwent baseball sutures.
conclusionUterotomy closure with baseball-type suturing seems to be an advantageous method as compared to the traditional techniques in terms of preserving the residual myometrial thickness and preventing isthmocele formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.