ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2025
Comparison of the effect of cardioplegic solutions used in cardiac surgery on myocardial protection.
Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Comparison of clinical outcomes of open and closed cardioplegia sets used during cardiopulmonary bypass".Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Comment on "Comparison of the effect of cardioplegic solutions used in cardiac surgery on myocardial protection".Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effects of cardioplegic solutions on myocardial protection factors in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and to evaluate the relationship between these effects and early clinical outcomes.
methodsA total of 78 patients were included in the study. The data of patients who received del Nido cardioplegia (Group 1; n=39) and blood cardioplegia (Group 2; n=39) during the operation were grouped and compared. Preoperative and postoperative routine parameters such as creatine phosphokinase, troponin I, C-reactive protein, and demographic data were recorded, and statistical analyses were performed.
resultsPerfusion time, cross-clamp time, act pump, preoperative C-reactive protein, preoperative creatine phosphokinase, preoperative troponin I, postoperative C-reactive protein, postoperative creatine phosphokinase, postoperative troponin I values were significantly different between del Nido and blood groups (p<0.05).
conclusionDel Nido cardioplegia provided myocardial protection and early postoperative favorable results compared to blood cardioplegia, which may make it a viable option for conventional cardiopulmonary bypass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.