ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2025
Construction and validation of an information portal on combined HIV prevention.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
to build and validate an information portal on the combined prevention of human immunodeficiency virus infection. a four-stage methodological study: definition, architecture, design, and implementation. The validation process was carried out by 24 nurses and 23 professionals specializing in Information Technology. A Likert-type questionnaire described the agreement between nurses/experts and IT professionals concerning the different attributes. The Content Validity Index was considered to have a cut-off point equal to or greater than 0.80. the agreement rates were satisfactory, totaling 0.94 overall among nurses and 0.96 among IT professionals. The validity indicators showed satisfactory agreement in the attributes of general impression (0.96), objectives (0.90), adequacy of content (0.98) and language (1.00), relevance (0.96), high potential for attractiveness (0.91), and for innovation (0.90). In addition, the proposed technology has resources that guarantee easy navigation (0.96), as well as the quality of the interface (0.96), aesthetics, and audiovisuals (0.99). it can be concluded that PREVI@IDST is an innovative educational resource because it brings together valid evidence for information and guidance on combined HIV prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.