ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2025
Development of safety protocols for managing thirst in post-extubated and tracheostomized patients.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thirst level trajectories and influencing factors in critically ill patients based on a group-based trajectory model: A prospective observational study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Persistent Thirst and Its Clinical Correlates in Critically Ill Adults: A Prospective Observational Study.Nursing in critical care · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
to develop two distinct protocols, based on evidence, with safety criteria for post-extubated and tracheostomized patients in order to support the administration of thirst relief methods. methodological study divided into two phases: definition of the scope and development of the protocols. Safety criteria were identified and submitted to the evaluation of reliability of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADEpro) system. The criteria were incorporated into flowcharts with their respective operational manuals. The Experts formulated recommendations and the Content Validity Index was calculated. two protocols and its respective manuals were developed to assess the safety of the administration of thirst relief methods: one for post-extubated patients and the other for tracheostomized patients. Safety criteria listed: level of consciousness, signs of respiratory failure, nausea and/or vomiting, swallowing ability, coughing/airway protection, voice changes and adequate functioning of the tracheostomy tube. The Experts' recommendations were obtained with a Content Validity Index of 87%. the clinical protocols, with six safety criteria each, based on evidence for the management of thirst in post-extubated and tracheostomized patients are innovative, allow safety assessment for thirst management and shows content validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.