Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40332109›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

hTERT and SV40LgT Renal Cell Lines Adjust Their Transcriptional Responses After Copy Number Changes from the Parent Proximal Tubule Cells.

Bruce Alex Merrick, Ashley M Brooks, Julie F Foley, Negin P Martin, Rick D Fannin, Wesley Gladwell, Kevin E Gerrish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bruce Alex MerrickMechanistic Toxicology Branch, Division of Translational Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA.
Ashley M BrooksBiostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, Integrative Bioinformatics Support Group, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2242-5942
Julie F FoleyMechanistic Toxicology Branch, Division of Translational Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA.
Negin P MartinViral Vector Core, Neurobiology Laboratory, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3166-8989
Rick D FanninMolecular Genomics Core Laboratory, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA.
Wesley GladwellMolecular Genomics Core Laboratory, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA.
Kevin E GerrishMolecular Genomics Core Laboratory, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA.

Funding

Intramural Funding by Divisional of Translational Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, USA Not Applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary mouse renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (moRPTECs) were immortalized by lentivirus transduction to create hTERT or SV40LgT (LgT) cell lines. Prior work showed a more pronounced injury and repair response in LgT versus hTERT cells after chemical challenge. We hypothesized that unique genomic changes occurred after immortalization, altering critical genes and pathways. RNA-seq profiling and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of parent, hTERT, and LgT cells showed that 92.5% of the annotated transcripts were shared, suggesting a conserved proximal tubule expression pattern. However, the cell lines exhibited unique transcriptomic and genomic profiles different from the parent cells. Three transcript classes were quite relevant for chemical challenge response-Cyps, ion channels, and metabolic transporters-each important for renal function. A pathway analysis of the hTERT cells suggested alterations in intermediary and energy metabolism. LgT cells exhibited pathway activation in cell cycle and DNA repair that was consistent with replication stress. Genomic karyotyping by combining WGS and RNA-seq data showed increased gene copy numbers in chromosome 5 for LgT cells, while hTERT cells displayed gene copy losses in chromosomes 4 and 9. These data suggest that the exaggerated transcriptional responses of LgT cells versus hTERT cells result from differences in gene copy numbers, replication stress, and the unique selection processes underlying LgT or hTERT immortalization.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGene DosageKidney Tubules, ProximalTelomeraseTranscription, GeneticAnimalsCell LineEpithelial CellsGene Expression ProfilingMiceTranscriptomeTelomerasecopy number variationimmortalizationkidneyproximal tubuletranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID40332109
PMCPMC12027150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.