ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
GBLUP Outperforms Quantile Mapping and Outlier Detection for Enhanced Genomic Prediction.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating Epistatic Interactions into Genomic Prediction of Growth and Fillet Fat Content in Common Carp.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) accelerates plant breeding by predicting complex traits using genomic data. This study compares genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), quantile mapping (QM)-an adjustment to GBLUP predictions-and four outlier detection methods. Using 14 real datasets, predictive accuracy was evaluated with Pearson's correlation (COR) and normalized root mean square error (NRMSE). GBLUP consistently outperformed all other methods, achieving an average COR of 0.65 and an NRMSE reduction of up to 10% compared to alternative approaches. The proportion of detected outliers was low (<7%), and their removal had minimal impact on GBLUP's predictive performance. QM provided slight improvements in datasets with skewed distributions but showed no significant advantage in well-distributed data. These findings confirm GBLUP's robustness and reliability, suggesting limited utility for QM when data deviations are minimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.