ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2025
From 70 to 100: The Kuakini Hawaii Centenarian Study.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPast research has highlighted the association of family longevity, support, functioning, and health and well-being factors in predicting longevity. Based on the Georgia Adaptation Model that examined the impact of clusters of bio-psycho-social predictors on extreme longevity and adaptation, the current study aimed to employ 7 clusters of behavioral and social predictors on longevity of Japanese-American men from Hawaii.
methodsA sample of 3 734 men (Mage = 77.82 years) from the Kuakini Honolulu Heart Program was included in this research. We focused on 3 research questions. One, WHO survived to their 70s, 80s, 90s, and 100s? Two, WHAT behavioral and social predictors were found to predict survivors of the different ages? Three, are the survival predictors the same or different for the Japanese-American men compared to extant findings in the literature?
resultsOur results demonstrated 4 distinct groups of survivors (70s, 80s, 90s, and 100+) and highlighted differentiating characteristics among groups. Moreover, regression analyses suggested that cognition, activity of daily living functioning, health behaviors, diabetes, and father's age at death were significantly associated with longevity. Finally, survival characteristics found among the Japanese-American men replicated many findings reported in the literature.
conclusionsThe results indicate that there are individual differences for survivors in the Kuakini Honolulu Study, as this sample reaches 70, 80, 90, or 100 years of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.