ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2025
Hallux Valgus: Prevalence and Treatment Options.
Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Finite element analysis of minimally invasive osteotomy fixation using oblique hollow headed compression screws and K-wires for hallux valgus osteotomy.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Outcomes and Complications for Minimally Invasive Distal Transverse Metatarsal Osteotomy-Akin Osteotomy (MITA) for Hallux Valgus: 493 Cases.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- [Effectiveness of orthopedic surgery for 247 patients with moderate and severe hallux valgus].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- Biomechanical comparison of five fixation methods in minimally invasive hallux valgus osteotomy: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHallux valgus is a common deformity. Surgical treatment strategies have evolved markedly in recent years. We report on the administrative prevalence of this condition and the available treatments for it.
methodsThe administrative prevalence of hallux valgus and the treatments provided for it in Germany were determined from data supplied by BARMER, a statutory health insurance carrier. The classification and treatment of hallux valgus are outlined in a narrative overview, with particular attention to a meta-analysis.
resultsThe administrative prevalence of hallux valgus in Germany is nearly 2%; 83% of the affected persons are women. Over a 6-year period, the number of operations declined, and there was a trend toward outpatient treatment. Hallux valgus should be classified as either mild/moderate or severe. The common surgical procedures achieved comparable correction of the bony deformity. The AOFAS score improved by an average of 33.8 points (95% CI: [30.5; 37.0]) across all surgical techniques, reaching average postoperative values that ranged from 81.4±7.7 and 90.1±4.8 points depending on the particular technique used. The choice of technique and the duration of follow-up had no significant effect on the subjective treatment outcome. The overall complication rate after surgical correction was 18.5%. The common complications were metatarsalgia, recurrent deformity, stiffness of the first metatarsal joint, wound-healing disorders, and hallux varus.
conclusionThe primary treatment of hallux valgus should be conservative. The various surgical techniques correct the bony deformity with comparable efficacy and good postoperative AOFAS scores. Patients with more severe deformities and greater impairment seem to have a higher potential for improvement in the AOFAS score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.