ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Engaging American Indian Tribal Members Using Group-Level Assessment to Identify Needs and Priorities of a Local Heart Disease Program to Improve Cardiac Care.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Community co-design of contextually relevant rheumatic heart disease primary prevention.BMJ global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac disease is a leading cause of death in American Indian populations, and echocardiographic screening within 1 tribal nation revealed 6% of tribal members had undiagnosed structural heart disease (SHD). However, improved strategies for scale-up of screening and wrap-around care are needed to improve outcomes. The purpose of this study was to engage tribal members in identifying priorities related to heart health to inform scalable models for improved SHD diagnosis, care, and outcomes. METHODS AND
resultsWe used group-level assessment, a qualitative and participatory large group method, to collaboratively generate information and interactively evaluate themes with relevant community members. Together with a Community Research Leadership Board established for this project, we held 4 group-level assessment sessions throughout the tribal land. Themes from each session were combined and distilled into priority areas. A total of 163 tribal members participated in the group-level assessment sessions. Five priorities for an SHD program were identified: (1) heart health/SHD education and awareness; (2) cultural considerations; (3) inclusive, multigenerational community engagement; (4) improved resources for general health and wellness; and (5) accessible, patient-centered health care with local cardiac care.
conclusionsGroup level assessment was the first step in our efforts to improve outcomes for American Indian tribal members with SHD. The generated community insights will directly inform the development of a cardiac disease extender program that will be codesigned with members of the Community Research Leadership Board, tribal community health workers, and the larger community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.