ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
Estimating death rates in complex humanitarian emergencies using the network survival method.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and Validity of Mobile Phone-Based Proxy Full Pregnancy History (mPFPH) for Estimating Perinatal Mortality in Rural Northwest Bangladesh.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2026Article
- Seven Months After Tropical Cyclone Chido in Mayotte: Early Lessons and Brain Health Challenges.Annals of global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable estimates of death rates in complex humanitarian emergencies are critical for assessing the severity of a crisis and for effectively allocating resources. However, in many humanitarian settings, logistical and security concerns make conventional methods for estimating death rates infeasible. We develop and test a new method for estimating death rates in humanitarian emergencies using reports of deaths in survey respondents' social networks. To test our method, we collected original data in Tanganyika Province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (n = 5311), a setting where reliable estimates of crude death rates (CDR) are in high demand. Qualitative fieldwork suggested testing 2 different types of personal networks as the basis for CDR estimates: deaths among immediate neighbors and deaths among kin. We compare our network-based estimates (0.44 deaths per 10 000 person-days) against a standard retrospective household mortality survey, which estimated a CDR nearly twice as high (0.81 deaths per 10 000 person-days). Given that both methods are equally plausible, our findings highlight the need for further validation and development of both methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.