Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40331604›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2025

Status and Opportunities for Improvement in Pain Education in Europe: A European Pain Federation EFIC Multiple-Methods Study.

Nathan Skidmore, Zsófia Nagy, Felicia J Cox, Frank J P M Huygen, Edmund Keogh, Andreas Kopf, Bart Morlion, Harriët Wittink, Mary O'Keeffe, Brona M Fullen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. "It Is a Vicious Circle": Experiences of People Living With Obesity and Chronic Pain: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES).Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nathan SkidmoreDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Social Sciences and Health, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7477-6720
Zsófia NagyRétköz Health Center, Budapest, Hungary.
Felicia J CoxPain Management Service, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Part of Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3624-6593
Frank J P M HuygenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Center for Pain Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2852-4880
Edmund KeoghCentre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1615-3699
Andreas KopfDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Bart MorlionCenter for Algology & Pain Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6156-880X
Harriët WittinkResearch Group Lifestyle and Health, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5592-2879
Mary O'KeeffeEuropean Pain Federation EFIC, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7104-9248
Brona M FullenUCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4408-2063

Funding

Grünenthal GmbH Zieglerstrasse 6 Aachen Germany €32.000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain is one of the most prevalent health issues in Europe, yet the quality of pain education for healthcare professionals remains unclear. This study assessed the status of undergraduate and postgraduate pain education for nurses, physicians, psychologists, and physiotherapists across Europe, identifying key strategies to enhance training and improve healthcare outcomes.

methodsA study using multiple methods was conducted, comprising a scoping review, an online survey of educators, and qualitative interviews with EFIC chapters and professional educational bodies.

resultsThe scoping review of 11 studies revealed a paucity of evidence, with significant heterogeneity in the hours dedicated to pain training and inconsistencies in both content, teaching, and assessment methods across European curricula. The survey of educators (n = 511) showed wide variability in pain education coverage, with psychology curricula particularly underrepresented compared to the more structured programmes in medicine and physiotherapy. The interviews highlighted curriculum constraints, lack of resources, and limited specialised staff as key barriers. They also underscored the importance of integrating pain education across all disciplines through international and interdisciplinary collaboration to enhance training efforts.

conclusionsSignificant gaps persist in the depth, consistency, and delivery of pain education for undergraduate and postgraduate health professionals across Europe. The absence of standardised, evidence-based curricula underscores the need for consistent pain education across all disciplines. Implementing targeted educational standards, increasing interdisciplinary training, and supporting qualified educators are essential to address this fragmented landscape. Standardising pain education has the potential to greatly improve patient outcomes by equipping healthcare professionals with more effective pain management skills. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This multiple method study provides an updated and comprehensive overview of the current state of pain education for healthcare professionals in Europe at undergraduate and postgraduate levels. Substantial gaps remain in the depth, consistency, and delivery of pain education for both undergraduate and postgraduate healthcare professionals across Europe. This underscores the need to enhance pain education at the undergraduate level, with EFIC's existing medicine and physiotherapy resources offering potential models, alongside wider efforts to implement comprehensive postgraduate training. Standardising the delivery of targeted pain education has the potential to greatly improve patient outcomes by equipping healthcare professionals with more effective pain management skills.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPain ManagementCurriculumEuropeHumans

Identifiers

PMID40331604
PMCPMC12057320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.