Trial reportCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
A Non-Inferior Randomized Trial of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Compared to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Patients With Hormone-Responsive and HER2-Negative Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer.
Trial report in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivesNeoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) has demonstrated efficacy in postmenopausal patients with hormone-responsive and HER2-negative breast cancer. However, few data are available on NET in premenopausal women. This trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) with NET in premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive, HER2-negative, and lymph node-negative breast cancer.MethodsIn this prospective, randomized study, premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive, HER2-negative, and lymph node-negative breast cancer were recruited. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either NCT or NET with goserelin and tamoxifen, followed by goserelin and anastrozole. The primary purpose was to evaluate the non-inferiority of NET to NCT using a clinical response rate assessed by ultrasound.ResultsA total of 68 patients were assigned to receive either NCT (n = 31) or NET (n = 37). The clinical response rate was 16.1% for NCT and 35.1% for NET (estimated difference 19.0%, 95%CI: -1.1%-39.1%, non-inferior
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.