ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2025
Impact of delivery method on postnatal depression in Jordanian women: Insights from a cross-sectional survey.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivePostnatal depression is a common and serious mental health problem. Despite the existence of established risk factors for postnatal depression, the role of the mode of delivery in influencing its prevalence remains a topic of debate. This study investigated the potential association between postnatal depression and the mode of delivery, specifically comparing the prevalence of postnatal depression in women who had a vaginal delivery versus those who underwent either an emergency or elective cesarean section. This study aimed to explore how different modes of delivery affect the prevalence and severity of postnatal depression among women in Jordan.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at Jordan University Hospital between January and April 2024 to assess postnatal depression among women who delivered singleton fetuses 1 week after delivery. The participants completed a self-reported questionnaire, which collected demographic data and responses to the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. These responses were used to evaluate postnatal depression symptoms.ResultsA total of 267 women participated in the study. Results showed no significant association or difference in the postnatal depression scores between different modes of delivery (p = 0.459 and 0.441). Moreover, gestational age at the time of delivery and the infant feeding method after delivery showed no significant differences in the postnatal depression scores (p = 0.681 and 0.537, respectively). Results showed that the occurrence of intrapartum complications was associated with an approximately two times greater risk of developing postnatal depression (adjusted odds ratio = 1.96, p = 0.013).DiscussionThis study found no clear relationship between the mode of delivery and postnatal depression, with similar depression scores observed across vaginal and cesarean deliveries. Peripartum complications were linked to a higher risk of postnatal depression, whereas factors such as age, occupation, and infant feeding method showed inconsistent associations. The results highlight the complex, multifactorial nature of postnatal depression.ConclusionsThere was no significant association or difference in the postnatal depression scores between the modes of delivery. The results suggested that factors other than the mode of delivery played a more significant role in the development of postnatal depression among the women included in this study. Although our findings contribute to the understanding of maternal mental health, further research is needed to explore additional risk factors and interventions for postnatal depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.