Trial reportActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025
Intraoperative Clonidine in Spine Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Preoperative Oral Clonidine in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical Efficacy and Risks of Clonidine Infusion for Sedation and Analgesia: A Narrative Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients undergoing spine surgery often experience post-operative pain. In this context, clonidine, an alpha-2 agonist, may be relevant due to its analgesic properties. We conducted a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a single dose of intraoperative intravenous clonidine on post-operative opioid consumption, pain intensity and side effects. Patients undergoing spine surgery at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, were randomised to receive intraoperative clonidine (3 μg/kg) or placebo. The primary outcome was opioid consumption within the first 3 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption within the first 6 h, pain intensity at rest and during coughing, post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and sedation in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Additional outcomes included time to discharge from the PACU, length of hospital stay and daily opioid consumption after 1 month. Data from 120 patients (49 females, 71 males, mean age 65 ± 14 years) were available for analysis; 61 received clonidine and 59 received placebo. Post-operative intravenous morphine equivalents within 3 h were similar in the clonidine group 5 mg (0-15) and the placebo group 10 mg (0-15) (p = 0.58). Pain intensity at rest was 4 (0-5.5) in the clonidine group and 3 (0-5) in the placebo group upon arrival at the PACU (p = 0.20). No differences were observed between the clonidine and placebo groups regarding any secondary outcomes, except for hypotension, which was more frequent in the clonidine group (24 vs. 13 patients). A single dose of intraoperative clonidine did not reduce post-operative opioid consumption or pain intensity in patients undergoing spine surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.