ArticlePlant physiology2025
Optimizing genomic prediction for complex traits via investigating multiple factors in switchgrass.
Article in Plant physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic prediction of agronomic traits in a switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) half-sib progeny panel evaluated across multiple environments.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Five genomes, same suspects: a comparative filter for plant GWAS candidates.Plant physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic prediction has accelerated breeding processes and provided mechanistic insights into the genetic bases of complex traits. To further optimize genomic prediction, we assess the impact of genome assemblies, genotyping approaches, variant types, allelic complexities, polyploidy levels, and population structures on the prediction of 20 complex traits in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), a perennial biofuel feedstock. Surprisingly, short read-based genome assembly performs comparably to or even better than long read-based assembly. Due to higher gene coverage, exome capture and multi-allelic variants outperform genotyping-by-sequencing and bi-allelic variants, respectively. Tetraploid models show higher prediction accuracy than octoploid models for most traits, likely due to the greater genetic distances among tetraploids. Depending on the trait in question, different types of variants need to be integrated for optimal predictions. Our study provides insights into the factors influencing genomic prediction outcomes, guiding best practices for future studies and for improving agronomic traits in switchgrass and other species through selective breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.