ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025
Pain Assessment and Its Effect on Pain Management During Emergency Medical Services-A Descriptive Study in the Tampere University Hospital Area of Finland.
Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPain management is an important part of prehospital care. Pain assessment and recognition are inseparable in adequate pain treatment. However, relatively scarce literature is available from Nordic and European countries. We investigated the current practices of pain assessment and management in the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) of one Finnish hospital area.
methodsThe cohort data were originally collected prospectively to assess various quality processes in EMS. This study was designed as a descriptive, retrospective, register-based cohort study, analysing data from 7245 patients encountered by EMS over a one-month period in the Tampere University Hospital area of Finland in 2021. Pain levels were primarily assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS). Records were combined with auxiliary data from the National Emergency Response Centre Agency. We grouped patients into six age groups and recorded dispatch categories in seven groups to clarify the impact of age and dispatch category on pain assessment and intensity. We used crosstabulation and Pearson's chi-square test for statistical analyses; we also applied a linear mixed model to analyse the effect of pain medication on pain intensity.
resultsPain was assessed once in 2586 (36%) patients and then reassessed a second time for 707 (27%) of those patients. Age and dispatch category affected pain intensity (p < 0.001): Patients under 66 reported higher pain intensity than patients over 66 years. In dispatch categories, "oxygen deficiency" and "non-mechanical accident or exposure," reported pain intensity was minimal compared to other categories. Of the patients with a pain assessment, 611 (24%) experienced pain equal to or greater than 4 on the NRS scale. We found that assessment with a high NRS level was associated with a higher likelihood of administering potent pain medication.
conclusionThe prevalence of pain assessment is relatively low. The diverse nature of EMS interventions must be considered when improving pain management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.