ArticleEcology2025
A classification-occupancy model based on automatically identified species data.
Article in Ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CABIF-Net: Robust Confidence-Based Audio-Visual Fusion for Fine-Grained Bird Recognition.Biology · 2026Article
- Predicted Relative Occupancy Probability of Raccoon Dogs (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Occupancy models estimate a species' occupancy probability while accounting for imperfect detection, but often overlook the issue of false-positive detections. This problem of false positives has gained attention recently with the rapid advancement of automated species detection tools using artificial intelligence (AI), which generate continuous confidence scores for each species detection. Novel occupancy models have been introduced that integrate these confidence scores to identify false positives, but these models require thorough assessments of diagnosis and validation. Here, we propose a new occupancy model based solely on AI-detected species data. We conducted simulations to examine the inferential and predictive accuracies with known true parameters and analyzed AI-detected species data to test the practical usefulness through goodness-of-fit tests and evaluation with external data. Our proposed model mostly outperformed alternative models that ignore imperfect detection or false-positive error probabilities in terms of accuracy in simulation analyses and goodness-of-fit tests in the case study, but not in terms of discrimination metrics based on external data. The proposed occupancy model aids in understanding species-habitat relationships and developing automated biodiversity monitoring workflows by accounting for both false-negative and false-positive errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.