ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2024
Quality Control in the Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Core: A Practical Primer.
Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of TIMS-derived peptide mobility measurements: calibration strategy and MS1/MS2 discrepancies.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- MSstatsQC-ML: A Supervised Machine Learning Approach to Monitor System Suitability and Quality Control in Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- Agentic AI-Assisted Coding Offers a Unique Opportunity to Instill Epistemic Grounding during Software Development.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- pmultiqc: An Open-Source, Lightweight, and Metadata-Oriented QC Reporting Library for MS Proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Proteomics Approaches to Ecoimmunology: New Insights into Wildlife Immunity and Disease.Integrative and comparative biology · 2025Review
- Brief Evaluation of Olink Reveal Proximity Extension Assay for High-Throughput Proteomics: A Case Study Using NIST SRM 1950 and Two Spike-In Protein Standards.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- QSample: An Automated System for Rapid Monitoring of Quality Indicators in Proteomics Samples.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The past decade has seen widespread advances in quality control (QC) materials and software tools focused specifically on mass spectrometry-based proteomics, yet the rate of adoption is inconsistent. Despite the fundamental importance of QC, it typically falls behind learning new techniques, instruments, or software. Considering how important QC is in a core setting where data is generated for non-mass spectrometry experts and confidence in delivered results is paramount, we have created this quick-start guide focusing on off-the-shelf QC materials and relatively easy-to-use QC software. We hope that by providing a background on the different levels of QC, different materials and their uses, describing QC design options, and highlighting some current QC software, implementing QC in a core setting will be easier than ever. There continues to be development in each of these areas (such as new materials and software), and the current generation of QC for mass spectrometry-based proteomics is more than capable of conveying confidence in results as well as minimizing laboratory downtime by guiding experimental, technical, and analytical troubleshooting from sample to results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.