ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Digital gratification: short video consumption and mental health in rural China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- "The clan carries us": kinship, honor, and the collective enactment of family resilience among Yi households living with HIV in rural Southwest China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Digital access, digital health information engagement, and self-reported preventive behavior among rural adults in Guizhou, China: media-use ecologies and cross-sectional associations.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The association between short video addiction and emotion dysregulation among college students: a latent profile analysis and its influencing factors.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Enhancing happiness and life satisfaction in university students: analysis with a machine learning approach.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Do the Four Components of Psychological Capital Have Differential Buffering Effects? A Longitudinal Study on Parental Neglect and Adolescent Problematic Short-Form Video Use.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, short videos have become increasingly popular in rural China, yet their impact on mental health remains underexplored. While prior studies have debated the psychological effects of social media, little is known about how short-form video consumption affects rural populations. Objective: This study investigates the causal relationship between short video consumption and mental health among rural residents in China. Methods: We use longitudinal data from the China Family Panel Studies and apply a Difference-in-Differences strategy to estimate the impact of frequent short video usage on mental health. To address self-selection and staggered treatment timing, we employ Propensity Score Matching and heterogeneity-robust difference-in-differences estimators. Robustness checks include placebo tests and an event study analysis. Results: We find that short video consumption appears to improve mental health among rural residents. The effect is immediate and significant only in the first year of exposure, but fades in subsequent periods. Mechanism analysis suggests that the improvements are driven by enhanced entertainment and information access rather than increased social interaction. The effects are more pronounced in economically underdeveloped and less pandemic-affected regions, but not evident among urban residents. Conclusion: Short videos provide short-term mental health benefits for rural Chinese residents by enriching their leisure and information access, especially in less developed areas. However, their positive effect is transient and cannot offset pandemic-related stress. Policy efforts should aim to balance the benefits of digital entertainment with potential risks such as addiction and information overload.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.