Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40331079›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025

Biosecurity measures and effects on health performance and antibiotic use in semi-intensive broiler farms in Uganda.

Dreck Ayebare, Irene Mbatidde, Naomi P Kemunto, Dishon M Muloi, Eugine L Ibayi, Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Dickson Ndoboli, Kristina Roesel, Bernd-Alois Tenhagen, Arshnee Moodley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dreck AyebareInternational Livestock Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Irene MbatiddeInternational Livestock Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Naomi P KemuntoDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dishon M MuloiInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Eugine L IbayiInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Søren Saxmose NielsenDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dickson NdoboliInternational Livestock Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Kristina RoeselInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Bernd-Alois TenhagenGerman Federal Institute of Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.
Arshnee MoodleyDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Effective biosecurity measures prevent the spread of pathogens, thereby reducing the need for antibiotic use on livestock farms. However, quantitative data on these practices and health outcomes in semi-intensive broiler farms in low-income settings is limited. A longitudinal study in Wakiso, Uganda, aimed to evaluate biosecurity practices, health performance, and antibiotic use in such farms. Methods: The FarmUSE survey tool was used to collect data from 19 farms over two production cycles. A biosecurity risk assessment tool was used to quantify biosecurity. Blood samples (n = 342) were collected and analyzed using the ProFLOK® assay to assess antibody responses to vaccines for Newcastle disease (NCD), Infectious Bronchitis (IB), and Infectious bursal disease (IBD). Results: Median biosecurity scores were 26.3 % for external measures, 55.6 % for internal measures, and an overall score of 38.5 %. Sixteen farms reported respiratory signs, and 12 had gastrointestinal issues, with median mortality rates of 2.9 % in the first cycle and 4.6 % in the second. Antibiotic use was reported by 84 % and 77 % of farms in the first and second cycles, respectively. The most used antibiotics were tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides, with the highest usage occurring during the brooding phase. Good antibody responses were reported in only 10.5 % of flocks for NCD and 16 % for IBD, while all farms had poor responses against IB. Conclusion: Recurrent clinical signs could be attributed to insufficient biosecurity and inadequate vaccination outcomes, resulting in high antibiotic usage despite low mortality rates. Improving diagnostic access and strengthening the vaccine supply chain are essential. Identifying feasible and cost-effective biosecurity practices for semi-intensive broiler farms can enhance health outcomes, reduce antibiotic use, and boost productivity.

Indexed as

Antibiotic useMortalityPoultryPreventionVaccines

Identifiers

PMID40331079
PMCPMC12051712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.