ArticleJournal of hip preservation surgery2025
Labral size measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging not predictive of the need for labral reconstruction in patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy.
Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preoperative radiographic measurements may help predict which patients with hip labral tears ultimately undergo repair versus primary reconstruction. This study investigated if radiographic parameters: (i) preoperatively predict labral repair versus reconstruction and (ii) correlate with T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) mapping values of the labrum. This retrospective comparative study included patients aged 14-50 years who underwent labral repair or reconstruction at a single institution over a 2-year period. Patients with prior open or arthroscopic hip surgery or who had inadequate preoperative computed tomography (CT) and MRI imaging were excluded. Labral size was measured at multiple positions on preoperative MRI images. A blinded reviewer used three-dimensional CT analysis to record lateral center edge angle (LCEA), acetabular version, Tonnis angle, acetabular coverage, alpha angle, femoral torsion, and neck-shaft angle (FNSA). T2 MRI mapping values of the labrum were obtained via sequencing analyses on each patient's optimal sagittal cut. Univariate mixed linear models were used to identify associations between each radiographic measurement and decision to repair or reconstruct the labrum. Fifty-two operations were included. Labral size had no predictive effect on undergoing labral reconstruction versus repair. Likelihood for undergoing labral reconstruction was associated with LCEA (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.