ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2025
Missed uterine rupture after vaginal delivery: a rare case of delayed diagnosis leading to sepsis and intra-abdominal abscess.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Rare case of first-trimester uterine rupture at 9 weeks' gestation following multiple hysteroscopic surgeries and a prior cesarean section.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine rupture during pregnancy is a rare but life-threatening complication that poses severe risks to both mother and fetus. While it is typically associated with a history of uterine surgery, its silent presentation post-vaginal delivery remains exceptionally uncommon and diagnostically challenging. We present an extraordinary case of a 30-year-old multigravida at 33 + 2 weeks gestation, who developed a silent uterine rupture days after an uneventful vaginal delivery. The condition was masked by atypical symptoms, leading to delayed diagnosis, prolonged sepsis, and an intra-abdominal abscess. Despite the absence of classical warning signs, the rupture necessitated urgent surgical intervention, ultimately preserving maternal health and uterine integrity with loss of the fetus. This case underscores the critical need for heightened clinical suspicion and advanced imaging techniques in managing post-delivery complications, especially in patients with a scarred uterus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.