Observational studyRomanian journal of ophthalmology
Fern-Like Pattern on Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiography Across Various Uveitic Conditions.
Observational study in Romanian journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the occurrence and characteristics of the "Fern-like pattern" (FLP) on ultra-wide field fluorescein angiography (UWFA) across a variety of uveitic conditions, challenging the traditional association of FLP primarily with Behçet's disease (BD). Methods: This observational study at a tertiary care centre in India analysed the UWFA images of 23 eyes from 12 patients diagnosed with BD, tubercular vasculitis, intermediate uveitis, Vogt‒Koyanagi‒Harada (VKH) syndrome, or exudative retinal detachment. Clinical and imaging data were reviewed to assess the presence and implications of FLP in these conditions. Results: The study included 12 patients: 8 males (66.67%) and four females (33.33%). The distribution was: 3 with BD, 4 with tubercular vasculitis, 3 with intermediate uveitis, 1 with VKH syndrome, and 1 with exudative retinal detachment. The average age was 29.58 ± 11.35 years. Anterior segment examination revealed significantly more hypopyon, cells, and posterior synechiae in BD patients. Posterior segment examination showed choroiditis exclusively in non-Behçet's patients and considerably increased vitritis in BD patients. Disc hyperfluorescence and neovascularization were substantially more common in BD patients. Discussion: Our study is the first to comprehensively assess the presence of FLP on UWFA across both BD and non-BD uveitic conditions, demonstrating its occurrence in TB vasculitis, VKH syndrome, and intermediate uveitis. While traditionally linked to BD, FLP signifies retinal capillary leakage and inflammation, necessitating careful differential diagnosis. We observed optic disc hyperfluorescence predominantly in BD, underscoring its role as a potential disease activity marker requiring aggressive immunosuppression. Notably, FLP was identified in exudative retinal detachment and VKH, suggesting shared inflammatory mechanisms across conditions. These findings broaden the clinical relevance of FLP in uveitis and highlight the need for further studies to explore its diagnostic and prognostic significance. Conclusion: The study confirms that FLP on UWFA is not exclusive to BD and appears in other uveitic conditions. Clinical signs such as hypopyon and disc hyperfluorescence indicate BD, whereas choroiditis is more common in non-Behçet's uveitis. These findings highlight the importance of precise clinical and imaging assessments to distinguish between different uveitic conditions for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.