ReviewRomanian journal of ophthalmology
Innovative technologies for the treatment of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) - modern therapeutic perspectives and their future.
Review in Romanian journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This review explores modern therapeutic options for the dry form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a condition representing one of the most significant challenges in ophthalmology due to its progressive nature and lack of effective treatment. The study discusses innovative approaches, evaluates available methods, and examines the potential of emerging technologies to improve patients' quality of life. Methods: A comprehensive review of current literature was conducted, being focused on therapies for dry AMD, including classical methods such as AREDS/AREDS2 supplementation, molecularly targeted drugs, gene therapy, cell transplants, tissue engineering, nanotechnology, and light-based therapies. Emerging tools leveraging artificial intelligence for personalized treatment and predictive modeling were also evaluated. Results: AREDS/AREDS2 therapies effectively slow disease progression but cannot reverse retinal damage. Advances include molecularly targeted therapies (Pegcetacoplan, Avacincaptad Pegol) that reduce inflammation, gene therapy (HMR59) protecting RPE cells, and mitochondria-targeted drugs (SS-31) mitigating oxidative stress. Using scaffolds, nanoparticles, tissue engineering, and nanotechnology enhances RPE regeneration and drug delivery. Light-based therapies (LLLT, adaptive phototherapy) improve mitochondrial function, while AI aids in predicting disease progression and personalizing treatment. Conclusions: Modern therapeutic approaches for dry AMD provide promising avenues to slow disease progression and protect vision. However, further clinical trials are needed to optimize these strategies, assess long-term outcomes, and expand patient access to effective treatments. These advancements have the potential to significantly improve the quality of life for individuals affected by dry AMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.