Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330946›Full record

ArticleAME case reports2025

CO

Giuseppe Lodi, Fabrizio Rocco Mancuso, Tiziano Zingoni, Irene Fusco, Giovanni Cannarozzo, Mario Sannino

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Comparative Effectiveness of Fractional COClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giuseppe LodiDermatology Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Fabrizio Rocco MancusoDermatology Unit, Health Sciences Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Tiziano ZingoniDepartment of Clinical Research and Practice, El.En. Group, Calenzano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8688-7787
Irene FuscoDepartment of Clinical Research and Practice, El.En. Group, Calenzano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7264-8808
Giovanni CannarozzoLaser Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Mario SanninoLaser Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The penile frenulum is a sensitive tissue fold connecting the glans to the penile shaft, preventing excessive foreskin retraction during an erection. Susceptible to injuries from trauma or medical treatments, effective repair is crucial for restoring functionality and alleviating discomfort. Traditional frenulum repair typically involves scalpel surgery, but CO Case Description: A 25-year-old male experienced a frenulum perforation after aggressive cryotherapy for recurrent genital condylomas. This damage required effective treatment to restore functionality and relieve discomfort. The patient underwent CO Conclusions: CO

Indexed as

case reportCO2 laserfrenuloplastylaser therapypenile frenulum

Identifiers

PMID40330946
PMCPMC12053987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.